CHL1 Hypermethylation in Breast Cancer
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women and one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide (1-3). It is a clinically heterogeneous disease, with at least 5 different subtypes (4) and quite variable prognosis, even within a subtype. In spite of early detection programmes, unfortunately 20-30% of early stage cases will eventually experience recurrence and develop distant metastasis. However, currently, there is no acceptable method for monitoring patients who are likely to progress (5). Therefore, the mechanisms responsible for BC development and progression are still to be elucidated.
Over the past decade, aberrant DNA methylation has been recognised as one of the most common molecular abnormalities in BC (6, 7). Methylation of certain genes has been related to clinical and pathological characteristics of breast tumours, and is considered a biomarker of diagnosis (8), hormone receptor (9) and HER2 (10) status, response to tamoxifen (9) and chemotherapy (11), metastases during follow-up (6), and a predictor of survival (9, 12).
The CHL1 gene encodes a member of the L1 family of neural cell adhesion molecules which has been slightly described in BC. It has been reported to be downregulated in BC tissues compared to non-cancerous breast tissues (13), but nothing is known about the causes of this silencing. Regarding the biological role of CHL1 in BC, its overexpression has been described to impair BC cell proliferation and invasion, while CHL1 depletion caused the opposite effect in vitro, and promoted tumour formation in vivo (2). Nevertheless, the clinical value of CHL1 silencing in human tissues as a potential biomarker of prognosis remains unknown. Therefore, our aim was to determine the mechanisms and clinical implications of CHL1 downregulation in BC.
Since DNA hypermethylation is one of the main mechanisms of gene silencing, we explored the methylation status of 3 CpG sites in the CHL1 gene promoter by pyrosequencing in a series of 142 breast tumours, 45 paired tumour and adjacent-to-tumour tissues, and 19 non-neoplastic breast tissues from reduction mammoplasties. Based on optimal cut-off values established by ROC curve analyses, we found that tumour tissues had significantly higher methylation levels than non-neoplastic breast samples did, while adjacent-to-tumour tissues harboured intermediate methylation levels. Interestingly, this epigenetic alteration was maintained across all BC subtypes. A similar protein expression pattern was observed by immunohistochemistry: breast tumours, with high methylation levels, displayed a lower level of CHL1 protein expression than non-neoplastic tissues, with low methylation levels. Additionally, a very strong correlation between methylation and expression was found in vitro in 4 BC cell lines and the immortalised but not neoplastic mammary HBL-100 cell line. Indeed, when these cell lines were treated with two epigenetic drugs (the demethylating agent 5-aza-2´-deoxycytidine and the histone deacetylase inhibitor Trichostatin A), the levels of CHL1 expression increased. Moreover, when CHL1 expression was silenced in the only mammary tissue-derived cell line with high CHL1 levels (the non-neoplastic HBL-100 cells), cell proliferation and migration, but not invasion, were enhanced, as measured by real-time cell analysis. Finally, using the abovementioned cut-off values of CHL1 methylation, we found that the hypermethylation of the CHL1 gene was very significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival, regardless of age and stage.
To sum up, our results show for the first time that: i) the CHL1 gene is downregulated in BC at least in part due to promoter hypermethylation; ii) this epigenetic alteration may be already present in the non-neoplastic adjacent-to-tumour tissue; and iii) that CHL1 hypermethylation is an independent prognostic biomarker in BC. Therefore, the relevance and significance of our work could rely on examining the methylation status of the CHL1 gene in a BC patient in order to predict if she will eventually relapse, and thus, she could be more strictly followed-up and benefit from therapy as soon as possible.
Martín-Sánchez E, Mendaza S, Ulazia-Garmendia A, Monreal-Santesteban I, Blanco-Luquin I, Córdoba A, Vicente-García F, Pérez-Janices N, Escors D, Megías D, López-Serra P, Esteller M, Illarramendi JJ, & Guerrero-Setas D (2017). CHL1 hypermethylation as a potential biomarker of poor prognosis in breast cancer. Oncotarget PMID: 28178655
1. Stefansson OA, Moran S, Gomez A, Sayols S, Arribas-Jorba C, Sandoval J, Hilmarsdottir H, Olafsdottir E, Tryggvadottir L, Jonasson JG, Eyfjord J, & Esteller M (2015). A DNA methylation-based definition of biologically distinct breast cancer subtypes. Molecular oncology, 9 (3), 555-68 PMID: 25468711
2. He LH, Ma Q, Shi YH, Ge J, Zhao HM, Li SF, & Tong ZS (2013). CHL1 is involved in human breast tumorigenesis and progression. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 438 (2), 433-8 PMID: 23906755
3. Smith RA, Andrews K, Brooks D, DeSantis CE, Fedewa SA, Lortet-Tieulent J, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brawley OW, & Wender RC (2016). Cancer screening in the United States, 2016: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 66 (2), 96-114 PMID: 26797525
4. Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thürlimann B, Senn HJ, & Panel members. (2013). Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 24 (9), 2206-23 PMID: 23917950
5. Huo D, Clayton WM, Yoshimatsu TF, Chen J, & Olopade OI (2016). Identification of a circulating microRNA signature to distinguish recurrence in breast cancer patients. Oncotarget, 7 (34), 55231-55248 PMID: 27409424
6. Feng W, Shen L, Wen S, Rosen DG, Jelinek J, Hu X, Huan S, Huang M, Liu J, Sahin AA, Hunt KK, Bast RC Jr, Shen Y, Issa JP, & Yu Y (2007). Correlation between CpG methylation profiles and hormone receptor status in breast cancers. Breast cancer research : BCR, 9 (4) PMID: 17764565
7. Karsli-Ceppioglu S, Dagdemir A, Judes G, Ngollo M, Penault-Llorca F, Pajon A, Bignon YJ, & Bernard-Gallon D (2014). Epigenetic mechanisms of breast cancer: an update of the current knowledge. Epigenomics, 6 (6), 651-64 PMID: 25531258
8. Fang, C., Wei, X., Zeng, X., Wang, F., Weng, H., & Long, X. (2015). Aberrant GSTP1 promoter methylation is associated with increased risk and advanced stage of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 19 case-control studies BMC Cancer, 15 (1) DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1926-1
9. Widschwendter M, Siegmund KD, Müller HM, Fiegl H, Marth C, Müller-Holzner E, Jones PA, & Laird PW (2004). Association of breast cancer DNA methylation profiles with hormone receptor status and response to tamoxifen. Cancer research, 64 (11), 3807-13 PMID: 15172987
10. Fiegl H, Millinger S, Goebel G, Müller-Holzner E, Marth C, Laird PW, & Widschwendter M (2006). Breast cancer DNA methylation profiles in cancer cells and tumor stroma: association with HER-2/neu status in primary breast cancer. Cancer research, 66 (1), 29-33 PMID: 16397211
11. Wang L, Zeng H, Wang Q, Zhao Z, Boyer TG, Bian X, & Xu W (2015). MED12 methylation by CARM1 sensitizes human breast cancer cells to chemotherapy drugs. Science advances, 1 (9) PMID: 26601288
12. Shen Y, Wang Z, Loo LW, Ni Y, Jia W, Fei P, Risch HA, Katsaros D, & Yu H (2015). LINC00472 expression is regulated by promoter methylation and associated with disease-free survival in patients with grade 2 breast cancer. Breast cancer research and treatment, 154 (3), 473-82 PMID: 26564482
13. Senchenko VN, Krasnov GS, Dmitriev AA, Kudryavtseva AV, Anedchenko EA, Braga EA, Pronina IV, Kondratieva TT, Ivanov SV, Zabarovsky ER, & Lerman MI (2011). Differential expression of CHL1 gene during development of major human cancers. PloS one, 6 (3) PMID: 21408220